Individuals of the nation are attempting to process the consequences of the casting a ballot results. In this circumstance two news stories were distributed in the press for two sequential days. On the main page of Prothom Alo, the nation's political defenselessness was caught in the title two successive days. Friday's news: 'The administration does not need resistance in the legislature, the Prime Minister's choice needs the Jatiya Party'. Saturday's title: 'Japan's principle restriction, hostile to Ershad pioneer'. 

I needed to comprehend the two reports, what is the law? The Parliamentary Procedure Rules stated, as indicated by the Speaker's controlling, the pioneer of the resistance will be the pioneer. The choice of the speaker is conclusive. The speaker's choice, as indicated by the act of parliamentary vote based system, is definitely not an unmistakable fascination. Their standard will be judicious to parliamentary majority rule government. There is a sentence in our law. Also, that is the "resistance pioneer" signifies the speaker's view is that the pioneer of the gathering or sub-aggregate shaped as most of the individuals from parliament, which restricts the administration's parliament, is the pioneer. In the decision of 2018, the Grand Alliance accomplice Japan authoritatively They are joint accomplices of advancement governmental issues. 

Addressing the Jatiya Party serve and later a senior clergyman of Awami League at Motofon on Thursday night. The Japanese Minister stated, what will individuals say to Japan if their own thoughts sit in the resistance party singing gestures of recognition of the legislature for the whole decision crusade. On 12 April 1973, Bangabandhu Sheik Mujibur Rahman said that 25 individuals would should be a resistance party. On the off chance that no less than 10, it very well may be known as a parliamentary scene. Khondaker Abdul Haque has said that this idea is in accordance with the sub-mainland parliamentary convention. The book on parliamentary traditions was distributed in 2001 in the subsidizing of UNDP (his late speaker Humayun Rashid Chowdhury was the Parliamentary Consultant). Parliamentary traditions are for the most part on the speaker's decision. In any event what number of individuals can be called restriction parties, No speaker has given explicit governing in Bangladesh. On the off chance that 545 individuals get somewhere around one-tenth position in India's Lok Sabha, they will get the status as 'parliamentary gathering'. No less than 30 individuals won't get acknowledgment of the parliamentary gathering. Notwithstanding, the parliamentary gathering won't get the status of the resistance. There were no resistance parties in three Lok Sabha seats till 1969. There is no doubt of restriction from the Indian Parliament for a long time because of the congressional number being decreased. However, a condition in Bangladesh 

It is the satisfaction. Whatever the number, it should be a 'hostile to government party'. It is realized that the BNP isn't heading off to the Parliament. Then again, the Gana Forum group can be seen on Friday night in converses with Sultan Mohammad Mansur. 

At the point when BNP is in the parliament, the pioneer of restriction BNP and pioneer of Sultan of Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, it is increasingly adequate. Not at all like the blacklist of the BNP blacklist. In 1973 Ataur Rahman Khan needed the pioneer of the restriction party. In the Parliament of 315 seats (counting 15 saved for ladies), 307 were Awami League's. Zillur Rahman, the late pioneer of whatever remains of the gathering, called 'the purported restriction party' to spread the warmth. 

We might want to remind that the speaker endorsing the 'counter government' speaker (5 to 7) requested a different room in parliament building. Bangabandhu made that remark subsequent to partaking in the discussion after assignment of that room. In any case, Ataur Rahman Khan said that the Prime Minister gave the contention (25 individuals) to the congressional law, it was overruled by the law. Thus, if the BNP does not come, the Gono Forum will be the real fundamental restriction party. Suranjit Sengupta never forgotten that while Bangabandhu said to him, 'You are my restriction party.' 

Presently, however, one can drive day and night to think day, yet whoever has faith in it something like one, that Japan is never again the resistance gathering of the present government. So Japan does not meet this prerequisite. The second state of being the fundamental restriction is to be the second biggest gathering of the parliament. Japan satisfies this necessity. In any case, on the off chance that they are not 'hostile to government parties', they lose significance to how much, in numbers. At the point when the senior priest of Awami League says to the senior pastor, the lesser seats the BNP is, they are the legitimate party, and they rush to oppose this idea. Stated, what will be finished by getting Japan 22? 

For what reason did Japan clarify in the restriction GM Quader yesterday? Stated, "The Jatiya Party will assume the job of the primary resistance through exchange and talk, taking into account that there is no lack in the direct of parliament." It clearly does not meet the lawful prerequisites of the restriction party. 

Obviously the official group from the pre-surge mindset has not yet possessed the capacity to turn out. Till January 28, there are protected conditions for the residency of the tenth Parliament. Be that as it may, where is the abuse to satisfy it now? Ershad did not have any desire to hold up till the eleventh parliament was shaped. There are two parts of legitimacy. A political other is lawful. Ershad's resistance chief is unlawful in both ways. It doesn't bolster sound and fair legislative issues. It doesn't bolster Parliamentary Procedure Rules. Somebody may state that before the arrangement of the Eleventh Parliament, Ershad could have let himself know as a pioneer of the restriction through public statement since he can guarantee that there will be the same choice as the parliament. 

Ershad is the antagonist of governmental issues. She is differing as being applicable. Be that as it may, as the scoundrels appear, the blood signs of Nur Hossain won't be expelled from his hands. The resistance chief is still in the situation of previous First Lady serve. There are unique represetatives in the position of pastor himself. The 2014 race boycotted the primary resistance party, since individuals were not cheerful about sitting in their restriction party. Japan did not do less dramatization yet Then there was arrangement for the competitors in 300 seats. This time, casted a ballot together. He didn't challenge for one and a half seats. So the decision battle and readiness of the two-scene is on a very basic level unique. Ershad saw the fantasy of turning into the pioneer of the parliament. Presently consent to be the pioneer of the restriction. Ershad in the homicide instance of opportunity warrior Manjur in the year 2016, the new manifestation of our national life Hopefully, Do not acknowledge the speaker because of lawful obstacle. Since the conditions are not met, there is a case of the restriction chief running in neighboring India. So the principle resistance gathering will blacklist. Be that as it may, as a supporter of the administration, we won't have any desire to see the disputable pioneer of an independent gathering as 'pioneer of the resistance'. 

In spite of the fact that it isn't printed, Ershad won't change the voltage, it can not be said. Pundits state his story is somewhere else. He is the 'undetectable playboy' 

doll. He truly made a dishonorable case of the restriction party on the planet. After the gathering with Indian Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh in December 2013, he said that the Jamaat government would not have done the JP race. Jamaat did not take part in the decision. In any case, we host seen Ershad's gathering responsible for the council framed for the preliminary of Bangalis who were stuck in Pakistan in 1971. 

We can not overlook the recollections of the ridiculous assortment of Shaheed Milon, truck and truck driver of Selim and Delwar. Much the same as General Zia and Khaleda Zia, Ershad is the rehabilitator of the Father of the Nation. Political validator of the executioner Faruq in the run-up to the presidential race He has as of late been a scoundrel and a 'fan' of the legislature. In the match, he and the vagrant did not motivate terrified to take a gander at the BNP. Be that as it may, each nine and a half long periods of hostile to despotism development, each trademark was denounced, judge Ershad. Judge his partners. That sound did not coordinate the breeze.